literature

Why Capitalists Hate Marijuana

Deviation Actions

cosmo-anarchial's avatar
Published:
1.2K Views

Literature Text

Why is marijuana illegal?
Why are all drugs illegal, for that matter?
One reason, one big reason, is that habitual drug users, on the whole, live outside mainstream society. They don't work nine to five, they don't pay large taxes, they don't buy multiple cars or make large investments. They don't put their copious amounts of money back into the economy, so that the richer can become richer and maintain their capitalist stronghold on American democracy.
Yet, yes, while this is actually a commendable quality, there are good reasons why hard drugs are illegal. Someone needs to tell you that these are harmful to you and harmful to others. They kill, and seeing as our strongest instinct remains survival, it makes sense for there to be rules, regulations, laws surrounding them.
But, dear drug users! To have this rare quality of being outside the system, putting your money into ventures that do not support capitalist gain can be attained alternatively, consciously! The money you spend to fuel drug wars could be put into self-sustaining enterprises, with like-minded people, reducing your environmental impact, exploring creative energies. A myriad of things!, with the sole intent of preservation, sustainment of the environment. Honest, respectable, responsible work.
The problem remains that drug users are not living outside of mainstream society voluntarily. Their goals still lie in their current or next fix.
What about marijuana users? Highly conscious people? Marijuana enhances the senses, often through which realizations of large truths occur. Marijuana users, already familiar with the act of financing drug market instead of the 'free' market, are more likely to recognize this, to harbor anarchist/utopian ideals, to use creative energy rather than entering, say, highly competitive business ventures. They are more likely to go live on farms, in jungles and mountain ranges, live "smaller" lives in complacency.
Capitalists don't like this brand of complacency; they like competition and gain. That's what it's about! They want you to work for them, for the smallest salary they can get away with, and buy, buy, buy.
Capitalists know the effects of marijuana, they have the statistics and studies. They want to keep you away from drugs so that you will earn more and buy bigger, more expensive, more unnecessary things that they spend years in development and dollars making for you. They want you in debt, to keep you working.
So what about marijuana? Does it kill? No. So it must be the *other effects* which anger law-makers.
"Marijuana makes you lazy." Translation: Marijuana persuades you to steer away from, or lose care for, what you originally suspected was not altogether important to you.
So if the system makes you uncomfortable, restricted... if it calls you a criminal... as a pot smoker, wouldn't that, somewhat often, persuade you to maintain your pot-smokin', free-lovin', liberal-thinkin' lifestyle?
Pot is a substance which makes you think critically. And if there's anything education statistics, the American news media and our obesity epidemic can teach you, it's that our government isn't all too concerned with raising critical, intelligent, well-balanced citizens.
"That's one more lost to the Marijuanites, Mr. President, sir! We had him all the way through prep school, but it seems we lost him in college!"
This is in no way an advocation of marijuana use. It is foremost an informal essay on, yet again, the capitalist version of sustainment; the system of sucking you dry to feed the vampiric elite.
Yes, I wrote this stoned. Unedited for your pleasure.




Under the 'Contains mature content' Yes/No option in submitting this informal essay, there is an option I'd never noticed before, labelled, 'Ideologically sensitive.' Personally, I find it idiotic to label your work as not to perturb the *ideological sensitivity* of other artists on dA. You know, if you're an artist, hell, if you're a *reader*, you should expect sometimes, better yet welcome, for your ideology, your viewpoints to be questioned by the material and by yourself. Or is the purpose of this feature to warn others of the possible offensiveness of the piece, so as to deter them from reading/viewing, or leaving particularly negative feedback? So that the writer, for example, must therefore announce, 'This is offensive! And it might flip you out! It's about S&M!' Effectively stopping all potential future leather and chain-loving readers from reading a piece of literature which might have opened them up or broken through a mental wall somewhere. It's just an example, and there are many. Am I to assume homosexuality is 'ideologically sensitive'? Should I label anything gay, so that no one's *accidentally offended*? So that I don't, theoretically, so to speak, 'trick' someone into reading a story of two fags in love?
I'm sure there are plenty of people in this community whom support legalizing marijuana, and plenty of people who don't. I'll be damned if I'll label this essay as ideologically sensitive for those who don't, though. It might very well deter you from reading, and *gasp* adopting a new, maybe self-challenging, idea. Though, hey, this particular essay may not be a stellar example. :)
Someone please explain the necessity of this feature.
© 2008 - 2024 cosmo-anarchial
Comments10
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Just-Another-Critic's avatar
BS.

 A true capitalist would see a market opening and supply it and become wealthy. The users would need an income and provide to civilization to afford any weed, therefore the capitalist has benefitted all parties involved by providing value to people.

Perhaps some of the users would work for his business perhaps being passionate about the product being able to help better serve new users and giving him a healthy income and a job to love. Expanding the market to healthier processes and happy employees who are passionate to become efficient and to continue growing the business and public knowledge on the plant and drug. Helping society to accept and put to other use other than recreational use, so in the long term perhaps without even knowing it, the capitalist would help.